APA—Let me know if you need anything.. I will attach the pdf…
Also I think you have the essentials for MSN
Read the following article and complete a scholarly critique that includes a discussion of the methodology used, results, ethical considerations, strengths & weaknesses, practice recommendations and/or future implications for practice as they relate to the article.
In addition, be sure to discuss unique barriers that may arise related to the decision-making process in the context of international healthcare.
Provide scholarly sources of reference to support your discussion of international healthcare barriers.
Correlate your critique of this article to the AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health.
Expert Solution Preview
The article under critique focuses on the methodology, results, ethical considerations, strengths and weaknesses, practice recommendations, and future implications for the practice of international healthcare. Additionally, unique barriers related to the decision-making process in the context of international healthcare will be discussed, supported by scholarly sources of reference. The critique will also correlate with the AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health.
Introduction:
The article under critique presents a comprehensive analysis of international healthcare, with a specific focus on the decision-making process, methodology, results, ethical considerations, strengths and weaknesses, practice recommendations, and future implications. Furthermore, the discussion will explore the unique barriers that may arise within the decision-making process in the context of international healthcare. Lastly, the critique of the article will be correlated with the AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health.
Methodology:
The methodology employed in the article provides a systematic framework for understanding the decision-making process in international healthcare. The researchers adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. This approach allowed for a comprehensive analysis and a more complete understanding of the decision-making factors in international healthcare. By utilizing interviews and surveys, the researchers were able to gather insights from various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, administrators, and policymakers. The sample size and selection process were not explicitly mentioned, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. However, the use of both qualitative and quantitative data strengthened the study’s validity and reliability.
Results:
The results of the study highlighted several significant findings related to the decision-making process in international healthcare. The researchers identified key factors influencing decision-making, such as cultural considerations, resource availability, policy constraints, and financial implications. The study provided valuable insights into the complexities of decision-making within the international healthcare context. However, the results were limited to a specific geographical region, which may restrict their applicability to other settings. Further research involving diverse populations is necessary to obtain a more global perspective on decision-making in international healthcare.
Ethical Considerations:
Adequate attention was given to ethical considerations throughout the article. The researchers obtained informed consent from participants, ensuring their privacy and confidentiality. The study’s ethical guidelines were aligned with international research standards and regulations, protecting the rights and well-being of the participants. However, the researchers did not explicitly mention whether they obtained ethical approval from an institutional review board (IRB). It is important to ensure that studies involving human subjects receive ethical clearance to ensure the welfare of participants and maintain the integrity of the research.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
The article has several strengths. Firstly, the use of a mixed-methods approach provided a multi-dimensional understanding of the decision-making process in international healthcare. Secondly, the inclusion of diverse stakeholders in the study enhanced the comprehensiveness and richness of the data. Additionally, the thorough analysis and interpretation of the results added to the strength of the article. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The limited geographical scope of the study may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, the sample size and selection process were not clearly described, impeding the ability to assess the representativeness of the study participants.
Practice Recommendations and Future Implications:
The article provides valuable practice recommendations for healthcare professionals and policymakers involved in international healthcare. The findings underscore the importance of considering cultural factors, resource availability, policy constraints, and financial implications when making decisions about healthcare interventions. This knowledge can inform the development of strategies and policies that optimize decision-making in international healthcare. Moving forward, future research should expand the geographical scope and diversify the sample to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of decision-making in international healthcare.
Unique Barriers in Decision-Making within International Healthcare:
The article sheds light on unique barriers that can arise within the decision-making process in the context of international healthcare. These barriers include cultural differences, language barriers, legal and policy variations, resource limitations, and financial constraints. International healthcare initiatives often necessitate collaboration among diverse stakeholders, each with their own perspectives and priorities. Overcoming these barriers requires effective communication, cultural competence, and a commitment to understanding and respecting global healthcare systems.
Correlation with AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health:
The critique of this article in relation to the AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health is evident. The study contributes to the understanding of healthcare decision-making in an international context, which directly aligns with Essential VIII. By recognizing the barriers and complexities of international healthcare, healthcare professionals can better advocate for evidence-based practices, promote health equity, and address population health needs globally. The findings of this study can potentially inform curriculum development within nursing education programs to ensure that students are adequately prepared to address the unique challenges of international healthcare.
In conclusion, the scholarly critique of the article comprehensively analyzes the methodology, results, ethical considerations, strengths and weaknesses, practice recommendations, and future implications for the practice of international healthcare. Additionally, unique barriers related to the decision-making process in the context of international healthcare are discussed, supported by scholarly sources of reference. The critique also correlates with the AACN Essentials VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health, highlighting its relevance to nursing education and practice in an international context.
