WU Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis Questions Nursing Assignment Help

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

To Prepare:

Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.

Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.

Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

  • Some examples of healthcare programs/policies are:
  • Healthy school lunches
  • Vaccination programs (state,      federal, or local levels)

CMS (a specific component; not      the entire program)

Tobacco cessation programs

Cancer screening programs

  • The Assignment:

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.

How was the success of the program or policy measured?

  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?

How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?

What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?

What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?

Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:

In this assignment, students are required to analyze and evaluate an existing healthcare program or policy. They will use the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template to assess the effectiveness of the program or policy based on various criteria. The assignment aims to enhance students’ understanding of program evaluation, measurement of outcomes, stakeholder involvement, and unintended consequences. Additionally, it encourages students to critically assess the original intent and objectives of the program or policy and consider their role as nurse advocates in program evaluation.

Answer:

The healthcare program or policy I selected for evaluation is the “Vaccination Programs” at the state level. This program aims to increase vaccination rates among the population and prevent the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases.

1. Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
The healthcare program aims to achieve high vaccination rates across the state, ensuring adequate protection against vaccine-preventable diseases. It intends to prevent disease outbreaks and reduce morbidity and mortality rates related to these diseases.

2. How was the success of the program or policy measured?
The success of the vaccination program was measured by assessing the vaccination coverage rate. The percentage of the targeted population that received the recommended vaccinations within the designated timeframe served as a key measure of success.

3. How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
The program aimed to reach the entire population residing in the state, including individuals of all ages. The target population included infants, children, adolescents, adults, and older adults.

4. How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
The program aimed to have a significant impact by achieving high vaccination rates across the state. The impact was measured by the reduction in the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases, hospitalizations, and deaths related to these diseases.

5. At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
The program evaluation was conducted annually, one year after the program’s implementation. This allowed for an in-depth assessment of the program’s effectiveness, identification of any challenges, and necessary modifications.

6. What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
Data from various sources were used to evaluate the program. This included vaccination records from healthcare facilities, national surveillance systems, and surveys conducted to assess public awareness and attitudes towards vaccination.

7. What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
During the program evaluation, specific information on potential unintended consequences was identified. These included vaccine hesitancy among certain population groups, increased demand for healthcare resources due to higher vaccination rates, and challenges in maintaining a consistent supply of vaccines.

8. What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
Stakeholders involved in the evaluation of the vaccination program included healthcare providers, public health agencies, community organizations, policymakers, and the general public. Healthcare providers and public health agencies would benefit most from the evaluation results as they could determine the effectiveness of their interventions and identify areas for improvement. Policymakers would also benefit to assess if the program achieved its intended goals.

9. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
The program partially met its original intent and objectives. While it achieved a significant increase in vaccination rates and reduction in vaccine-preventable diseases, challenges such as vaccine hesitancy and maintaining a consistent vaccine supply posed limitations to complete success.

10. Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
I would recommend implementing this program or policy in my place of work. Vaccination programs play a vital role in preventing disease outbreaks and protecting public health. The evaluation results provide valuable insights that can guide improvements in vaccination practices and address challenges such as vaccine hesitancy.

11. Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
As a nurse advocate, I could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation by:

– Conducting surveys or interviews to assess the public’s awareness and satisfaction with the program.
– Collaborating with other healthcare professionals to analyze data related to vaccination rates and adverse events, identifying areas for improvement and advocacy.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the evaluation of healthcare programs or policies is crucial to ensure their effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. Nurses, with their expertise and patient advocacy, play a vital role in program evaluation. The vaccination program evaluation highlighted the importance of measuring outcomes, involving stakeholders, and addressing unintended consequences. As nurse advocates, we have the opportunity to contribute to program evaluation and policymaking to enhance healthcare delivery and public health outcomes.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Scenario Upper management has been watching and is impressed Nursing Assignment Help

Scenario Upper management has been watching and is impressed by the work you have done as project lead to gather information for this departmental expansion project. Your administrator passes along their request that you use your skills in project management to explain health care facility design project management by creating a proposal of what this project

IHP 630 Module Four Project Preparation Guidelines and Nursing Assignment Help

IHP 630 Module Four Project Preparation Guidelines and RubricOverview In this module, you learned about how governmental and nongovernmental health insurance models impact financial management and strategic planning in a healthcare organization. You also explored the reporting requirements for payers. In this activity, you will create a report that compares

Topic: The use of Gabapentin for post herpetic neuralgia. Nursing Assignment Help

Topic: The use of Gabapentin for post herpetic neuralgia. Modality:Topical Literature review / Educational practicum for patient’s education. Reference: Multimedia product, video, blog, website, animation ( Topic: The use of Gabapentin for post herpetic neuralgia. Modality:  Literature review / Educational practicum for patient’s education. Reference: Multimedia product, video, blog, website,

Can someone help with …. Briefly discuss the Nursing Assignment Help

Can someone help with …. Briefly discuss the interrelationship among theory, practice, and research. Then, explain how your future practice as a nurse practitioner can inform theory and research.   With at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources. 

Create a 10-15 slide Power Point presentation of your Nursing Assignment Help

Create a 10-15 slide Power Point presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in the digital classroom

CONTROVERSY ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONALITY AND PARAPHILIC Nursing Assignment Help

CONTROVERSY ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONALITY AND PARAPHILIC DISORDERS Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their