In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for

In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for change, revocation, modification, and addition to the research topic. Your research topic has come from an issue, problem, or policy of law enforcement, corrections, or the court system. In this assignment, you will revise your IP 4 draft based on instructor and peer feedback and you will evaluate an alternative position to your  topic selected that was not addressed in your original IP4 draft. 

-First, revise your unit 4 IP bases on instructor feedback and peer responses. 

-Next, add to your final IP4 draft by addressing the following in 4-5 pages: 

Select 1 alternative to your position addresses in the Unit IP4 regarding your selected topic: 

What major points  are argues by proponents of this alternative position? Explain in detail. 

Conduct research on this alternative position and evaluate the arguments. 

-Do the arguments hold any merit? Why/why not? 

– What policies currently exist that support these arguments? Explain in detail. 

-Which position is more significant for improving the current state of the criminal justice system? Explain in detail. 

Remember to use academic and scholarly sources to support your arguments. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

The article “Dumbing Down Juries” raises concerns about how attorneys often remove jurors with specialized knowledge or professional expertise during

The article “Dumbing Down Juries” raises concerns about how attorneys often remove jurors with specialized knowledge or professional expertise during jury selection—favoring those perceived as more easily influenced. While this strategy may serve legal tactics, it raises important questions about fairness, competence, and transparency in the judicial process. In the

Scruples” Assignment Students shall personally write and upload “A Question of Scruples” (“Scruples”) question by the deadline noted at the end of the

Scruples” Assignment Students shall personally write and upload “A Question of Scruples” (“Scruples”) question by the deadline noted at the end of the syllabus. The “Scruples” question should present a short moral or ethical dilemma. Following the question (the “Scruples card”), the student should then describe why the question is in fact a