In 1971, the Supreme Court concluded in Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971) that an Idaho law that discriminated against women was unconstitutional under the

In 1971, the Supreme Court concluded in Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971) that an Idaho law that discriminated against women was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment. Before this case, no court had ever made such a ruling.  Two other key Fourteenth Amendment cases from the 1970s concerned jury duty for women: Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) and Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979).

Given those cases, apply what you have learned to this hypothetical situation regarding your law firm’s client, Keiko.

Keiko and her husband TJ jointly own a farm and home in Arkansas. A law in their home state grants husbands the authority to sell the property without the wife’s consent. That law (Ark. Code 987.zyx) provides:

“The husband is the head and master of the partnership or community of assets (property and money); the husband can sell and use the revenue which any asset produces, without the consent and permission of his wife.”

Keiko recently left TJ because he was verbally and physically abusive to her and their minor son, Buddy.

Your supervising attorney (Will Freeman, under his signature) has asked you to write the first draft of a client letter to Keiko addressing the following: 

1.  TJ decided the farm was no longer profitable and it was time to sell it. Can he do so without Keiko’s consent?

2.  In what types of cases will the court use a strict scrutiny analysis, intermediate scrutiny analysis, or a rational basis review? Which level review is appropriate for Keiko’s case?

3.  Apply a Fourteenth Amendment legal analysis to determine whether this law is constitutional. Research other cases to support your analysis. What was the court’s approach and reasoning regarding equal protection? How do you think it applies to Keiko and TJ’s situation? Based on your analysis, do you think Keiko should pursue litigation? If she does not want to litigate, what other solutions are possible?

4.  Shepardize one of the cases noted above and find a subsequent case to support your analysis and conclusion. (Identify which of the three cases you Shepardized, as well as the facts and holding of the new case you found.)  

5.  After you conclude the letter to Keiko, address the following: 

     a.  What are the implications of what you have learned as a result of analyzing this hypothetical scenario and its relationship to the historical evolution of Fourteenth Amendment law? (As you reflect on this, focus on legal and societal perspectives within their respective historical contexts, not applying a modern lens to older time periods. But you can use the old points of view to make informed reasoning within the contemporary contexts.)  

     b.  What challenges did you discover, including how society was, is, or could be affected? How have or could the challenges be overcome? Has (or can) technology be used to make improvements? Why or why not?

Please be sure to provide appropriate citations to your cases and other sources.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Topic: The Impact of Mental Health Courts on Recidivism Rates Among Offenders with Mental Illness Directions: Your research paper should contain the

Topic: The Impact of Mental Health Courts on Recidivism Rates Among Offenders with Mental Illness Directions: Your research paper should contain the following sections. Additional details are available on the page Research Paper Assignment Requirements. • Introduction • Methodology • Literature Review • Analysis of the Literature • Conclusion •

4.2 After watching the TEDx Talk by Michelle Deitch on juvenile justice, answer the following questions:  Should juveniles be tried as adults in the

4.2 After watching the TEDx Talk by Michelle Deitch on juvenile justice, answer the following questions:  Should juveniles be tried as adults in the pursuit of justice? Why or why not?Consider how the principles of justice—fairness, accountability, proportionality, and rehabilitation—apply to youth in the legal system. Are there conditions under

Briefing a case is the activity of summarizing a court opinion. A paralegal’s job revolves around writing. A paralegal will draft numerous documents

Briefing a case is the activity of summarizing a court opinion. A paralegal’s job revolves around writing. A paralegal will draft numerous documents including: correspondence with clients and other attorneys, memoranda, discovery requests, and legal pleadings. Most of the paralegal’s written documents will incorporate the law. A paralegal must have

Discussion 3.3: Social Solidarity  Instructions: Step 1. Choose Your Society – Choose one of the following scenarios: A. Mechanical Solidarity WorldYou

Discussion 3.3: Social Solidarity  Instructions: Step 1. Choose Your Society – Choose one of the following scenarios: A. Mechanical Solidarity WorldYou live in a small, isolated farming village in the 1700s. Everyone shares the same religion, occupation, customs, and daily routines. B. Organic Solidarity WorldYou live in a large, modern city