In Week 8, you must submit a formal research paper (10-15 pages), which will be worth 45% of your course grade. Your paper needs to analyze the jury

In Week 8, you must submit a formal research paper (10-15 pages), which will be worth 45% of your course grade. Your paper needs to analyze the jury selection process and its relationship to both: (a) Constitutional law, and (b) an allied field (e.g., education, history, law enforcement, public administration, public policy, psychology, sociology, technology, etc.).  By definition then, you will be required to address the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees a defendant the right to a trial by a fair and impartial jury.

For this assignment, due week 5 

Submit a literature review of your completed research for your jury selection research paper. 

Your literature review should be well-organized and easy to follow. You MUST offer a critical review of at least 4 articles (scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, or government publications). 

Please cite in Bluebook format.

Remember, this submission is not simply a list of articles that you located. Review the APUS sample provided in the APUS Literature Review guide.

Finally, your paper must not simply be a reiteration of articles that you locate. Rather, your goal is to “provide context for your own research.”

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Global Trends in Illicit Wildlife Trade The primary purpose of the project is to thoroughly investigate and define the dynamics of the global ‘Illicit

Global Trends in Illicit Wildlife Trade The primary purpose of the project is to thoroughly investigate and define the dynamics of the global ‘Illicit Wildlife Trade’ (IWT) to enhance theAustralian Border Force’s (ABF) ability to effectively counteract these illegal operations. Introduction-300 words Any lessons learnt or recommendations arising from research

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Let’s expand this discussion to the criminal justice system. Specifically, the adjudication stage. Please address the following: Should individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder be held responsible for

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the