Philosophy Final: Essay Question / Prompt You are defending someone accused of robbing a bank.  It’s already been shown that they committed the

Philosophy Final:

Essay Question / Prompt You are defending someone accused of robbing a bank.  It’s already been shown that they committed the robbery – your client confessed, and the confession is backed up by footage from a security camera.  In short, there’s no doubt they did it. 

Your goal is to argue that even though they physically committed the act, they are not responsible for what happened, since they were not acting freely.  Your defense should focus on the concepts of determinism and incompatibilism, which we discussed in class.  Make sure to note the conception of freedom that underlies incompatibilism.

Don’t worry whether appeals to determinism and incompatibilism would work in a court of law (they would not).  You are only arguing that your client is not morally responsible, regardless of whether they’re legally responsible. 

Your essay should not exceed 400 words.   

·
Write this paper in the simplest form ever, as. If you were explaining it to a 12-year-old

·
NO super long FANCY words

·
Very simple words

·
NO Citations

·
NO AI

·
NO PLAGARISM

·
Double spaced, Times New Roman

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  In this discussion, you will explain how theoretical perspectives relate to everyday life. Complete the following: Choose one of the following three

  In this discussion, you will explain how theoretical perspectives relate to everyday life. Complete the following: Choose one of the following three theoretical perspectives. Structural Functionalism Conflict Theory Symbolic Interactions Explain how this perspective relates to your everyday life. Create an open-ended question for your peers related to this

Discussion post Considering the central tenets of Plotinus’s “Neoplatonism,” discuss how it might have impacted the formation of doctrine in early

Discussion post Considering the central tenets of Plotinus’s “Neoplatonism,” discuss how it might have impacted the formation of doctrine in early Christianity as well as how Christianity might have otherwise adopted some components of Ancient, Hellenistic and Roman philosophy. Instructions: provide an answer using scholarly resources to back up your