Discuss an important, memorable ethical dilemma from your childhood. What dilemma were you faced with, and how did you resolve it? What factors

Discuss an important, memorable ethical dilemma from your childhood. What dilemma were you faced with, and how did you resolve it? What factors influenced your decision? Looking back on it, would you do anything differently? How have your ethical views evolved since that event?

Please compose a response of approximately 500 words. Organize your response in the following manner.

  • First, describe your dilemma. Provide the necessary contextual details so that people who don’t know you can understand. Use the reporter’s questions of when, where, who, what, and how to set the scene.
  • Explain the solution—how did you resolve the conflict?
  • Reflect on one or more influences evident in your solution. In other words, why did you make this choice?

This is an exploratory paper and it should have a beginning, middle, and end created by your storytelling. Make this uniquely your story—give your reader a clear, detailed picture of your dilemma; a simple explanation of your solution; and a description of the influences that informed you.

Ethics demands honesty and integrity. The use of generative artificial intelligence is not allowed for this assignment or for any other assignment or graded discussion in this class. This assignment will be checked by Turnitin.

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

RubricEthical Memoir RubricEthical Memoir RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDilemma DescriptionIncludes a clear and detailed description of the ethical dilemma, including answers to who, what, where, when, how, and why.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSolutionExplains the solution to the ethical dilemma in a clear, straightforward fashion.30 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflectionIncludes reasons why the decision was made. Notes contributing influences.20 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and MechanicsResponse is formatted in APA style. Standard grammar and mechanics are followed.10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks10 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading Rubric:                                                                         Poor                                  Excellent Possible Introduction                                                   13.75   16.25   18.75   21.25   23.75   25 Start w/problem statement – why do this?  And lead into a theory – why do we predict the  variables to be related? Theories explain why Review

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S.

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S. (2023). Different types of laughter and their function foremotion regulation in dyadic interactions. Current Psychology: A Journal for DiversePerspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(28), 24249–24259. 2. Cai,

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitivedevelopment. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects ofinformation-processing theories