For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a

For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a quality or safety issue in a healthcare setting of your choice as well as a safety improvement plan.

You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your  Assessment 1 which was : (Improving Patient Safety in the Emergency Department through Communication) Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan template to help you to stay organized and concise.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.
  • Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.
  • Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.
  • Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
  • Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
  • Length of submission: Use the provided template to create a 4–6 page root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Judaism Discussion After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, as well as reviewing the Judaism Resources page, discuss the following: In you

Judaism Discussion After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, as well as reviewing the Judaism Resources page, discuss the following: In your reading of Chapter 10 – Encountering Judaism: The Way of God’s People as well as the other readings for the week, you have gained a better understanding of central themes of Judaism.

 Descartes’s First Principle After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: Re-read and ponder the quote by the

 Descartes’s First Principle After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: Re-read and ponder the quote by the Philosopher Rene Descartes on pages 3 and 4 of the downloaded textbook. Then give a critique of Descartes’s First Principle. Do you agree/ disagree and why? Submission Instructions:  Your initial post

Catholicism Written Report If preferred: Download Report InstructionsDownload Download Report Instructions Report Instructions:In your readings from

Catholicism Written Report If preferred: Download Report InstructionsDownload Download Report Instructions Report Instructions:In your readings from the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church you gleaned a better understanding of the what the Catholic Church’s teachings are on specific theological topics.   You will now use the

This task is Portfolio and it has two parts  portfolio instructions 1. Standardisation Comparison (15%) o Compare your standardisation from the

This task is Portfolio and it has two parts  portfolio instructions 1. Standardisation Comparison (15%) o Compare your standardisation from the Standardisation Task with the exemplar provided in the template. Explain the differences. o Word count: 200 maximum. Include a word count. 2. Analysis (85%) o Argument-by-argument identification and evaluation