See Attachment Response 6ab WHAT : REPLY to the TWO Discussion Posts FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List REFERENCES : TWO

See Attachment

Response 6ab

WHAT : REPLY to the TWO Discussion Posts

FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List

REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years 

INCLUDE : Turnitin Report

* Please and THANK YOU *

_______________________

AbDj 

Discussion Post Reply #1 

Primary sources of research are immediately available observations regarding a topic
obtained from people with direct experience. This can include but not limited to a
textbook, an article, and journals. A primary source makes available firsthand evidence
with original data.

An overview or comprehensive analysis of previous research is referred to as a
literature review. A literature review has a purpose to get a better understanding of
specific research.

According to an article wrote by Maeda et al. (2021), “systematic review is a
‘methodology used systematically to search for and synthesize knowledge generated
through empirical studies to inform policy and decision-making and to uncover hidden
patterns or trends that exist among relevant studies’(Grant & Booth, 2009)”. This
approach is usually used to minimized bias in summarizing research and is a form of
secondary research.

A meta-analysis is a “statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of
studies that produce a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true
magnitude of an effect” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p. 171). A systematic review
involves many studies to address a specific clinical question while avoiding bias, and
meta-analysis is used to analyze the studies into one result.

TaFri 

Discussion Post Reply #2 

Primary sources of research include the original data collected by the researcher or the
feelings and interpretation of the research by participants (Schuurman & Eijkman,
2013). However secondary sources include interpretations of research by other authors
(Schuurman & Eijkman, 2013). Sources of primary studies include CINAHL, Embase,
ERIC, and Medline (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). These sources are usually
accessible through institutions or personal subscriptions.

Literature reviews include a defined topic and research question, they provide a
summary of the literature emphasizing what is known in the literature and then provides
an overview summary of the research questions (Dodgeson, 2023). The researcher
should identify literature that can help them to answer the research question (Mathew,
2022). They should then summarize the knowledge found in the literature and can
further apply the review to their research (Dodgeson, 2023).

Systematic reviews are studies that use systematic search of literature and further
summarize primary research in away that is nonbiased (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,
202). Systematic reviews are seen as superior to primary sources due to the limited
bias in systematic reviews (Mathew, 2022). The key aspects of systematic reviews
include: ask (PICOT or research question), access (obtaining literature to answer
research question), assimilate (find strategies that were used to synthesize primary
research studies), appraise (includes a critical appraisal of literature studies), analyze
(analyze descriptive and quantitative data), and apply (explain how findings can be
applied to patients) (Mathew, 2022).

Meta-analysis is pulling data from different individual studies (Mathew, 2022). The data
may be presented via graphs or plots to allow the reader to easily understand the data.
The meta-analysis includes six questions to help the reader further understand the
data. These include: what is the comparison, what outcome is being compared, how is
the data presented, what statistical model is used, what is the pooled effect, and what
is the heterogeneity (Mathew, 2022).

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Geriatric Care Plan Concept Map Risk Factors for Nursing Diagnosis (3) 1.

Geriatric Care Plan Concept Map Risk Factors for Nursing Diagnosis (3) 1. Dementia 2. Lung disease 3. Recent viral illness Complications to Report (3) 1. Weight loss 2. Falls 3. Dizziness Challenges to Implementing Care Plan (3) 1. Resident’s mental capacity 2. Time 3. Etc. Things I Learned/Surprised Me After

738.2.1 : Foundations of Inquiry The learner differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence-based practice, and research.

738.2.1 : Foundations of Inquiry The learner differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence-based practice, and research. 738.2.2 :  Literature Review and Analysis The learner demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review. 738.2.3 :  Ethics and Research The learner demonstrates an understanding of the ethics of nursing research particularly human

1. Demonstrate competency in medication administration incorporating pharmacological principles. Answer the following questions directly on this

1. Demonstrate competency in medication administration incorporating pharmacological principles. Answer the following questions directly on this document. Please make sure to open the Word document underneath number 1. Please patient 1. Please refer to the following document about safe medication administration: 2. Discuss how you used the nursing process during

attached is the previous smart goals that was submitted, rubric, assignment details SMART Goals for PMHNP Clinical Rotation Jachai

attached is the previous smart goals that was submitted, rubric, assignment details SMART Goals for PMHNP Clinical Rotation Jachai Littlejohn St. Thomas University NUR-640CL-AP3 Dr. Howard March 23, 2025 Introduction SMART goals guide professional skill development. Focus on psychiatric evaluations and communication. Enhance evidence-based psychotherapy techniques application. Improve documentation and