Week 5 Discussion: Peer Feedback The ability to respectfully give and receive feedback is an important graduate-level

 

Week 5 Discussion: Peer Feedback

The ability to respectfully give and receive feedback is an important graduate-level competency, and it is something you encounter frequently as a writer and as a professional. On the giving end, the practice allows you to work on your communication, empathy, and evaluation skills. And on the receiving end, you gain the gift of seeing yourself and your work through someone else’s eyes.

For this Discussion, you provide feedback to a peer on their Week 3 Discussion post, including recommendations or resources to enhance their scholarly writing.

To Prepare

· Review your course announcements for possible information related to this week’s Discussion and Assignment.

· Review the resource on giving useful peer feedback.

· Recall the relationship between professional and academic communication that you explored in Week 2.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

By Day 4

Post your constructive review of one colleague’s post from Week 3. What did your colleague do well in terms of scholarly writing? How is your colleague’s scholarly voice conveyed? Provide specific examples of what you see in your colleague’s work. What recommendations or tips do you have based on the APA and scholarly writing resources provided? Be sure to select a colleague who does not yet have a review of their work. 

RESOURCES

 

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.-j).

Scholarly voice: Overview.Links to an external site.

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.-a).

APA course paper template.Links to an external site.

 

· Lunning, L. (2014, November 17).

How to give useful peer feedback.Links to an external site.
Walden University Writing Center.

· Shiell, A. (2015, January 12).
F

eedback journals can help develop an effective writing practiceLinks to an external site.

.Links to an external site. Walden University Writing Center.

Consider using the Feedback Journals within this resource as a means for tracking the feedback you receive throughout your program. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS · Product Liability · General Motors · Philip Morris · Remington Rifle Models 700 & 710 · Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer · Exploding Coca-Cola · Blitz Gas Cans · Most Innovative & Famous Leaders · Reed Hastings – Netflix · Evan Spiegel –

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall organizational performance. In this discussion thread, we will explore the importance of employee development from a human resource management perspective and some common types of employee development such as mentorship, coaching, and

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of