Resources Module 3 Required Readings · Wilson, S. (2016).  Thinking differently about leadership: A critical

Resources Module 3

Required Readings

· Wilson, S. (2016). 
Thinking differently about leadership: A critical history of leadership studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Chapters 5 & 6

·
Alvesson & Kärreman

 (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. 
 Human Relations
53, 1125-1149.

·
Alvesson & Spicer

 (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity.  
Human Relations
65, 367-390.

·
[NOTE: ALL GROUPS (RESPECTIVELY) WILL COLLABORATE TO ANNOTATE THIS READING. BEFORE BEGINNING THIS READING, PLEASE REVIEW THE ASSIGNMENT]

Recommended Readings

·
Cabantous et al. 

Reading.  Critical essay:  Reconsidering critical performativity.

·
Fleming & Banerjee

 Reading.  When performativity fails:  Implications for critical management studies.

·
Blommaert & Bulcaen

 Reading.  Critical discourse analysis.

Multimedia

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

See Attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

See Attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of