Discussion—Strength and Weakness of the EBPH in Defining a Public Health Problem Based on the readings assigned and suggested for this week and a review

Discussion—Strength and Weakness of the EBPH in Defining a Public Health Problem

Based on the readings assigned and suggested for this week and a review of the seven-stage, sequential framework to promote greater use of EBPH, do the following:

The application of evidence-based principles to a public health issue demands a scientific quantification of said public health issue. An integral component of the community assessment should include the targeted health condition or risk factor being considered, the population affected, the size and scope of the problem, prevention opportunities, and potential stakeholders. To aid in this task, epidemiology and the US surveillance system are applied to track and obtain necessary information about the frequency of the health condition or risk factor in an affected population.

Although data from surveillance systems can be used to obtain baseline and follow-up measurements for target populations, there may be limitations when using the data to evaluate intervention effectiveness for narrowly defined populations. In such a case, it may be necessary to estimate the frequency of disease or other health condition for the target population by using special surveys or appropriate study designs. Understanding the tradeoffs of various study designs will improve how you evaluate the effects of various public health programs and policies.

Review the study designs from the readings assigned and suggested for this week and present a brief summary of the appropriateness and advantages of using each study design as part of your effort to quantify the public health issue that you identified in Week 1 as part of your community assessment.

Write your initial response in approximately 300 words.

By the due date assigned, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through the end of the week, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Consider commenting on their stated advantages of using a specific study design. Do you agree or disagree with their stated advantages and why?

Support your answers with examples and research. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic. They should be your own, original, and free from plagiarism. Follow the APA format for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Summarized the appropriateness and advantages of using each study design as part of the effort to quantify a public health issue as part of the community assessment.

  • Responses demonstrated in-depth research and analysis.

  • Justified your answers with appropriate research and reasoning.

  • Commented on the postings of at least two peers.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

As the manager of the CTO Health Care Information Systems Department, you realize the need for seamless integration among all operating systems of the

As the manager of the CTO Health Care Information Systems Department, you realize the need for seamless integration among all operating systems of the departments within the healthcare organization (HCO). Discuss the importance of electronic health record (EHR) conceptual framework integration and achieving interoperability. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation for the

HIPAA Hero: Securing Your Medical Practice Database As a Database Administrator (DBA) for a medical practice, you're a champion for patient privacy!

HIPAA Hero: Securing Your Medical Practice Database As a Database Administrator (DBA) for a medical practice, you're a champion for patient privacy! You've implemented robust safeguards to comply with HIPAA regulations. But cybersecurity is an ongoing battle. Explore three additional practical measures you can take to further enhance your database

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and federal governments and organizations by conducting economic research such as the evaluations of burden of disease, cost effectiveness, and effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat specific diseases.