Briefing a case is the activity of summarizing a court opinion. A paralegal’s job revolves around writing. A paralegal will draft numerous documents

Briefing a case is the activity of summarizing a court opinion. A paralegal’s job revolves around writing. A paralegal will draft numerous documents including: correspondence with clients and other attorneys, memoranda, discovery requests, and legal pleadings. Most of the paralegal’s written documents will incorporate the law. A paralegal must have the ability to read the law, and apply the law to the facts of the present case. A paralegal must have the ability to analyze the law.  So here, you will begin to build these critical skills.

In this assignment, you will read a US Supreme Court case and write an essay about it. This will help you learn how to do the analysis that you may later need to write a case brief.  It also gets you used to understanding a case without worrying about the specific case brief format.

One case you can read and brief is Caetano v. Massachusetts. The PDF of the decision is attached to this assignment. You can also look up the case on LEXIS, www.oyez.org, and any number of other places. You may also choose another US Supreme Court case that interests you.

Your paper should be 2-3 pages long. Points will be deducted for spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. Please proofread your work – most errors are easily corrected by proofreading. When citing legal cases the case names should be done in standard Bluebook format. Example:York v. Smith, 65 U.S. 294 (1995). For further information, see Basic Legal Citation and look under the “How to Cite” section.

Also, remember that Bluebook requires footnotes – it does not use in-text citations or endnotes. I have attached a sheet about footnotes to help you, but please ask if you don’t understand!

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please answer both of the following Two Discussion Questions: (Due NLT Thursday of Week 2):From a “theoretical” (i.e. criminal justice theory) perspective

Please answer both of the following Two Discussion Questions: (Due NLT Thursday of Week 2):From a “theoretical” (i.e. criminal justice theory) perspective appraise (i.e., form a critical opinion) as to why transnational organized crime has continued to grow. In answering this question, you may use any criminological theory (e.g., Robert K

or this discussion, let’s have some fun with musical chairs. Apply the Marxist Criminological perspective to the following YouTube Shorts: How would

or this discussion, let’s have some fun with musical chairs. Apply the Marxist Criminological perspective to the following YouTube Shorts: How would Marxist Criminology describe and explain the behavior/actions of the individuals in the video (individually and collectively)?  Be sure to contextualize your response. For example: What does the chair

The U.S. Department of Justice’s organizational structure changed after 9/11/01. One section that was added is the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property

The U.S. Department of Justice’s organizational structure changed after 9/11/01. One section that was added is the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. Combatting cybercrime has implications that concern whether law enforcement must disregard some Constitutional rights to protect Americans. Some

Introduction to Contracts A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Contracts are foundational to business transactions

Introduction to Contracts A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Contracts are foundational to business transactions and personal agreements, governing how parties interact and fulfill their obligations. Types of Contracts Bilateral Contracts: Both parties make promises to each other. For example, a contract for the