Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

JOURNAL ENTRY #3 Critical reflection of your growth and development during your pediatric practicum experience in a clinical setting

May 12, 2025

JOURNAL ENTRY #3

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your pediatric practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

This week, you will write your last and final Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement. Further reflect on your pediatric patients you have seen and the conditions that you have diagnosed and treated. Review your Journal Entry that you submitted in Week 1.

Journal Entry (2–3 pages): 

· Explain what most excited and/or concerned you throughout your pediatric clinical experience.

· Discuss how your personal definition of family and family roles has changed or stayed the same.

· How has your understanding of family and family roles influenced your assessment of children and their families?

· Explain how your understanding of culture (both the culture of the provider and that of the child and his or her family) has changed and how it may have influenced the assessments you conducted during your practicum.

· Assess how you did with accomplishing the goals and objectives you developed in Week 1 for the practicum experience.

· Based on your practicum experience, refine your existing goals and/or develop new goals for your continued education and professional practice. Be sure to consider the NAPNAP Position Statement on Age Parameters for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice.

· Use title page and references according to APA.

RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommittee on Febrile Seizures. (2011).

Febrile seizures: Guideline for the neurodiagnostic evaluation of the child with a simple febrile seizure.Links to an external site.

Pediatrics,
127(2), 389–394.

Note: This is the most recent guideline.Links to an external site.

· National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, Professional Issues Committee. (2019).

NAPNAP position statement on age parameters for pediatric nurse practitioner practice.Links to an external site.

Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, 33(2), A9–A11.

Links to an external site.

Practicum Resources

· HSoft Corporation. (2019). 

Welcome to MeditrekLinks to an external site.

.

Note: Use this website to log in to Meditrek to report your clinical hours and patient encounters.Links to an external site.

· Walden University. (2019).

MSN nurse practitioner practicum manual

Links to an external site.
. to an external site.

· Walden University Field Experience. (2019a).

Field experience: College of Nursing.Links to an external site.

  to an external site.

· Walden University Field Experience. (2019b).

Student practicum resources: NP student orientationLinks to an external site.

.

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

BY DAY 7

Complete your Journal Entry #3 Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts from the
Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK11Journal3+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on
Upload File and select
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection	50 to >49.0 pts Excellent Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. 49 to >39.0 pts Good Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. 39 to >30.0 pts Fair Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples. 30 to >0 pts Poor Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth	30 to >29.0 pts Excellent Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. 29 to >19.0 pts Good Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. 19 to >9.0 pts Fair Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. 9 to >0 pts Poor Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting	15 to >14.0 pts Excellent Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. 14 to >10.0 pts Good Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. 10 to >5.0 pts Fair Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. 5 to >0 pts Poor Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent No APA errors 4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains 1-2 APA errors 3 to >1.0 pts Fair Contains 3-5 APA errors 1 to >0 pts Poor Contains > 5 APA errors	5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

>Nursing homework help

Share This Post

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Topic: Varicella Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to

Topic: Varicella Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. Template Example: PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx Download PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx 1. Select a health problem that primarily affects the pediatric population. (You did this in Module

After studying Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following: A 6-year-old has

After studying Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following: A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal. · What are key points in the history and physical examination? · How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old? ·

For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video

For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint. Expand All Introduction Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and

COMPLETE THIS WORK IN DETAIL. READ ALL THE INFO TO COMPLETE!!!! Comparing Healthcare Performance There are frequent articles

COMPLETE THIS WORK IN DETAIL. READ ALL THE INFO TO COMPLETE!!!! Comparing Healthcare Performance There are frequent articles blaring how poor the U.S. healthcare system is compared to other developed countries. Watch the provided video and read the following web site articles: Is U.S. health care the best or ‘least

Preparation: In this assessment, you’ll assess the effect of the health problem you’ve defined

Preparation: In this assessment, you’ll assess the effect of the health problem you’ve defined on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual. Plan to spend at least 2 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group. During this time, you may

Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change “My company name is Baptist Health of South Florida (BHSF)”

PLEASE SEE PHOTO FOR INSTRUCTUIONS MUST FOLLOW RUBRIC ATTACHED THE POWERPOINT TOPIC IS HIP DYSPLASIA IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT

CASE 1 EM is a 9 m.o. female who is here for follow up visit with Mother Chief Complaint. Ear Pain Exam done DX_ Identify issue—–

CASE 1 EM is a 9 m.o. female who is here for follow up visit with Mother Chief Complaint. Ear Pain Exam done ____ DX_____ Identify issue—– write like child has has this issues …explain due to doing this and that exam …. DX is _____ DDX__1 DDX 2 Explain

Putting It Together How might the use of qualitative and quantitative methods serve to provide answers for researchers regarding the challenges

Putting It Together How might the use of qualitative and quantitative methods serve to provide answers for researchers regarding the challenges associated with articles provided this week? What can qualitative data provide that quantitative data cannot, and vice versa? How might a mixed methods approach fill in the gaps to

Develop a health maintenance plan for Coronary Artery Disease 1. Assess, develop, and recommend health maintenance plans for clients

Develop a health maintenance plan for Coronary Artery Disease 1. Assess, develop, and recommend health maintenance plans for clients in all developmental stages of life within the primary care practice. 2. Apply evidence-based guidelines to the identification and prevention of significant healthcare problems affecting populations at risk. APA style 4-5 pages 4

The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse

The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course

Module 7 Discussion Theory Development and Evaluation Examine the science and a

Module 7 Discussion Theory Development and Evaluation Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources. · Quotes “……” cannot be

Critical Research Appraisal Assignment Goal: You will

Critical Research Appraisal Assignment Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Content Requirements: You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories: 1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research ·

Module 7 Discussion Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological

Module 7 Discussion Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders Based on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questions: 1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis 2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment 3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment 4.

Special Considerations for Patient Population Cases: You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to

Special Considerations for Patient Population Cases: You will consider the specific patient and determine the appropriate medication to prescribe, based on the patient specifics and medication attributes in various case studies. You will construct a 4- to 5-page paper in which you determine the medication, the dosing, necessary patient education,

Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Content Requirements: You will select one

Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Content Requirements: You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories: 1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research · Briefly, describe the characteristics of

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist: 11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) Main issues for

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist: 11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising a randomised controlled trial: Is the basic study design valid for a randomised controlled trial? (Section A) Was the

Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation. INSTRUCTIONS: · Your initial post should be at least 500

Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation. INSTRUCTIONS: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. · Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs · Please