Please see attachments   The document below shows which group’s project you are assigned to review and you will submit a generative critique that

Please see attachments  

The document below shows which group’s project you are assigned to review
and you will submit a generative critique that addresses the following prompts.
You can respond in a written document (500–700 words), a slide deck, a 1-page
zine-style visual, or another creative format of your choice. You will be graded
based on the rubric (below).

1. Understanding the Root Cause

What problem is this group trying to address?

What do you understand to be the root causes? Are they clearly identified?

What’s one insight you gained from how this group framed the issue?

2. Stakeholder Complexity

Whose interests were most considered in their analysis?

Who seems underrepresented or missing from their stakeholder map? Explain why this
matters.

Pose one thoughtful question about power, influence, or accountability among
stakeholders.

3. Creative Intervention as Experiment

What intervention did they propose? What stands out about it?

What do you think is brilliant, bold, or risky about their approach?

If you could tweak or expand this idea, what would you suggest? Why?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Improving Business Performance Week 5 Discussion Response Colleague 1

Improving Business Performance Week 5 Discussion Response Colleague 1 Lyndsay Camaroto Hello, According to Senge (2006) he discusses that system archetypes have the purpose of reconditioning the perceptions that to see the structures in a more conducive way that will be able to demonstrate patterns and areas needed for change.