Data Analysis · Choose a research study, QI article, or EBP DNP project and interpret at least one continuous demographic variable and one

Data Analysis

· Choose a research study, QI article, or EBP DNP project and interpret at least one continuous demographic variable and one categorical variable.

· Differentiate between comparisons made using descriptive statistics (e.g., the mean and standard deviation) and comparisons based on inferential statistics (e.g., a t test).

· Compare and contrast the sample sizes used in the research study, the QI project, and the DNP project in terms of type 1 and type 2 errors.

· Explain the SIR rate, how it is developed, and how organizations use it.

· Using the same articles, pick one and differentiate between one descriptive and one inferential statistic used in any one of the three studies/projects.

Health Policy

· Describe the nursing values and professional ethics related to the advocacy priority for Access to care, health inequities, and cultural competency for the Hispanic and latino community. 

· Why do our nursing values and ethics demand it be on the agenda? 

· Compare the role of law, ethics, or politics on Access to care, health inequities, and cultural competency in the Hispanic/Latino community

· Consider which area (law, ethics, or politics) has the most impact on the area.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal