pls read insturctions attached  Genogram Family Analysis This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram

pls read insturctions attached 

Genogram Family Analysis

This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram illustration

which highlights trends in family relationships, marital status, family issues, family patterns

of mental illness, and substance abuse.

Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:

1. Complete a 5 page in-depth analysis of the information gained in the family genogram.

2. Three issues should be addressed in this narrative:

3. Define what the term “family” means to you and describe how your definition of family

influenced the content of the genogram. Include cultural, spiritual and ethnic influences

in your response.

4. Describe your family’s structure. Include household composition, sibling constellations,

unusual family configurations and multiple families, i.e., foster care, adoption,

stepfamilies, and god-families. Provide specific examples of open-type, closed-type, or

random-type communication and the presence of boundaries, if any.

5. Discuss your reasons for excluding family members that may have been logical to

include.

6. Use key terms to interpret the family dynamics and communication and how it impacts

the family.

7. Interpret the family’s patterns and functioning between and within generations. Provide

specific examples to explain the family’s relationship with each other i.e., relationship

dynamics between generations and intergenerational and family member roles. Use key

terms to interpret life events like marriages, divorces, transitions, traumas, family secrets,

and critical life changes.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal