COMPLETE WORK IN DETAIL Thumbnails/thumbnail.png A Typical Day as a Medical Coder and Biller Essay As a medical coder, you will be responsible

COMPLETE WORK IN DETAIL

Thumbnails/thumbnail.png

A Typical Day as a Medical Coder and Biller Essay

As a medical coder, you will be responsible for reviewing patient documentation for encounters that has been added to an Electronic Health Record by a provider. You will ensure the accuracy and integrity of the codes that are used. Additionally, you will review each medical record for compliance purposes and report issues that may be apparent. When there is a question, you will ask or query your provider to confirm that the medical record supports the code selection. It really begins with the medical coder as they are the gatekeepers or coding accuracy and compliance.

Explore aspects of a coding position.

Include the following aspects in the assignment:

  •  Describe what you feel a day may be like once you become a coder

  •  What do you think will be most challenging?

  •  Summarize why it is essential to collaborate with clinical staff (MDs/APRNs) to resolve coding questions/discrepancies

  •  Provide an example of a time when it may be necessary to query a physician.


COMPLETE IN DETAIL

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal