The “Marihuana” tax act, along with the Harrison Narcotics Act, were not born from careful examination of an accumulation of evidence. Indeed, the strong opinions of reformists, and a cabal of powerful “anti-druggist” physicians and state and federal legislators were the primary catalysts for complete prohibition. Using context and examples from the readings, explain why this was problematic, and more broadly, why basing any policy solely on public opinion is problematic.
Respond back to these two different opinions on different methods of data display and how to choose which one works best for different types of results a
Respond back to these two different opinions on different methods of data display and how to choose which one works best for different types of results and points you are trying to make. tell what you like about their opinion 1. As a crime analyst, one important point I might