This assignment builds on the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment you completed in Topic 1 of this course. (the one with $19)
Assume that the sample risk management program you analyzed in Topic 1 was implemented and is now currently in use by your health care employer/organization.
Further, assume that your supervisor has asked you to create a high‐level summary brief of this new risk management program to share with a group of administrative personnel from a newly created community health organization in your state who has enlisted your organization’s assistance in developing their own risk management policies and procedures.
Compose a 1,250–word summary brief that expands upon the elements you first addressed in the Topic 1 assignment. In this summary brief, address the following points regarding your health care organization and its risk management program:
- Explain the role of your organization’s MIPPA-approved accreditation body (e.g., JC, ACR, IAC) in the evaluation of your institution’s quality improvement and risk management processes.
- Describe the roles that different levels of administrative personnel play in healthcare ethics and establishing or sustaining employer/employee-focused organizational risk management strategies and operational policies.
- Illustrate how your organization’s risk management and compliance programs support ethical standards, patient consent, and patient rights and responsibilities.
- Explain the legal and ethical responsibilities health care professionals face in upholding risk management policies and administering safe health care at your organization.
- Relate how your organization’s quality improvement processes support and contribute to its overall journey to excellence.
In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of three peer‐reviewed references.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
RUBRIC
1. An explanation of the role that the MIPPA-approved accreditation body plays in the evaluation of the quality improvement and risk management processes of an organization is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
2. A description of the roles administrative personnel play relevant to employer-employee-focused risk management strategies and operational policies is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
3. An illustration of how the rights and responsibilities of a patient are supported by risk management programs and quality improvement processes is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
4. An explanation of the legal and ethical responsibilities of health care professionals to uphold risk management policies and administer safe health care is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
5. Evidence of how the quality improvement processes of a health care organization support its Journey to Excellence is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
6. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
7. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
8. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
9. All format elements are correct.
10. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
NOTE: THIS PAPER WILL BE GRADED ACCORDING TO THE RUBRIC.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC ACCORDINGLY. Thanks.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for creating assignments and evaluating students in a medical college, the following is an answer to the content provided.
1. The MIPPA-approved accreditation body plays a crucial role in evaluating the quality improvement and risk management processes of an organization. These bodies, such as JC (Joint Commission), ACR (American College of Radiology), and IAC (Intersocietal Accreditation Commission), set standards and benchmarks for healthcare organizations to ensure they meet the requirements for high-quality care. By conducting thorough assessments, evaluations, and on-site visits, these accreditation bodies evaluate and monitor the organization’s risk management processes and their effectiveness in improving quality of care. They provide objective feedback, identify areas for improvement, and offer recommendations based on best practices and evidence-based guidelines.
2. Various levels of administrative personnel play integral roles in healthcare ethics and the establishment or sustenance of employer/employee-focused organizational risk management strategies and operational policies. Chief executive officers (CEOs), chief medical officers (CMOs), risk managers, and quality improvement officers collaborate to develop and implement risk management strategies that align with ethical principles and legal requirements. CEOs and CMOs emphasize the importance of ethical behavior and risk reduction in all aspects of the organization’s operations. Risk managers ensure that policies and procedures are in place to mitigate risks and promote a safe environment for patients and employees. Quality improvement officers monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of risk management strategies, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring compliance with ethical standards.
3. Risk management and compliance programs within the organization play a significant role in supporting ethical standards, patient consent, and patient rights and responsibilities. These programs ensure that ethical principles, such as autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence, are upheld throughout the organization. By implementing risk management strategies, organizations can minimize adverse events, ensure informed patient consent, and protect patient rights. Compliance programs ensure that privacy and confidentiality regulations are followed, promoting patient rights to privacy and information security. Additionally, these programs support patients’ responsibility to actively participate in their own care, empowering them to make informed decisions and collaborate with healthcare providers.
4. Health care professionals have both legal and ethical responsibilities in upholding risk management policies and administering safe healthcare. They are legally bound to follow risk management protocols and guidelines set forth by regulatory bodies and accreditation organizations. This includes properly documenting patient information, reporting incidents, and adhering to safety protocols. Ethically, healthcare professionals are responsible for providing safe and quality care to their patients, minimizing risks, and maintaining patient trust. They must also have a strong understanding of legal and ethical considerations surrounding issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, and patient rights.
5. Quality improvement processes within the organization contribute to its overall journey to excellence. By continuously monitoring and evaluating the organization’s performance, identifying areas for improvement, and implementing evidence-based practices, quality improvement initiatives support the organization’s commitment to providing high-quality care. These processes involve analyzing data, engaging in interdisciplinary collaboration, and implementing best practices to enhance patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and healthcare delivery. Quality improvement efforts also contribute to the organization’s reputation, demonstrating its commitment to excellence in healthcare.
In conclusion, the role of the MIPPA-approved accreditation body in evaluating quality improvement and risk management processes is crucial. Various levels of administrative personnel play significant roles in healthcare ethics and the establishment of risk management strategies. Risk management and compliance programs support ethical standards and patient rights. Health care professionals have legal and ethical responsibilities in upholding risk management policies. Quality improvement processes contribute to the organization’s overall journey to excellence.
